Confessions of an 4WD / SUV user


h1 January 24th, 2006

I have a confession to make.

I hate how many people buy 4WD/SUV vehicles these days.

I hate how many people buy them and then proceed to use it for nothing more than commuting around the suburbs.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not one of those militant hippies who think the vehicles are evil. I personally often go camping and hiking in the great outdoors, and a 4WD is often required for these little adventures. In fact, I spent considerable time in a Jeep Cherokee while recently on holiday with my friend Chris, and my brother Ben and his Mitsubishi Pajero.

Also, people in certain industries, such as agriculture, have a genuine need for these kinds of vehicles. So they have their place, I’m sure you’ll agree.

No, I don’t hate the vehicles. But I do hate the morons who sell them to other morons who don’t need them.

There, I’ve said it. I feel better now. But I guess now I’ve dropped that one on you, I had better articulate why I feel this way. I’ll try and do this in a more logical manner. So here goes:

  1. There can be no doubt that 4WD/SUV’s create more pollution. Vehicles of this kind use significantly more fuel than most other cars, such as sedans, hatchbacks etc. In a world that seems to be increasingly dependent on a decreasing supply of fossil fuel, this is insane behaviour. Additionally, many of the manufacturers do not (have to) hold these 4WD/SUV vehicles to the same (stricter) standards for emissions such as carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons, and nitrogen oxides
  2. I’ve known more than a few people that buy a 4WD/SUV because they feel their family will be safer in the case of an accident. This is not the case. In fact, these large, heavy vehicles can wreak tremendous damage on a “regular” car and it’s occupants. I have also read studies that show that a pedestrian struck by a 4WD/SUV has a much reduced chance of survival compared to a pedestrian struck by a sedan. With so many 4WD/SUV roaming the suburbs, this is a grave concern.
  3. Okay, this is purely anecdotal, from my own observations, but I’ve noticed that most of the worst drivers I know have bought 4WD/SUV’s. Deep down, they know they are lousy drivers, and they want to protect themselves. But having poor drivers zipping about recklessly in 3 tonne vehicles is plain scary. (Please note that I’m not calling 4WD/SUV owners reckless drivers, instead that the lousy drivers seem to gravitate towards owning these vehicles. Important difference.)
  4. Traffic is becoming a really major problem in just about every city around the globe. Don’t even get me started on the price of parking, or even the difficulty of finding a park. If a car is going to be used for a daily commute, with only the driver in the car it makes no sense for these large vehicles to be taking up so much space on the road or in the car parks.
  5. Car manufacturer across the board make huge profits on 4WD/SUV’s. Now, I don’t begrudge them to opportunity to make money - I too am a businessman. But when they are making 30-40% profits, I expect them to be delivering a vehicle that is safe, both for the environment, for the occupants and for others on the road. If I’m buying a car, I don’t want to be paying a premium that is used to prop up other product lines that don’t compete in the marketplace (I’m looking at you Ford). I want to get value for money at all times. I don’t think you get that from buying a 4WD/SUV, unless (gasp) you need it for off-road use! The marketers will tell you that buying this kind of vehicle is worth it because of the positive lifestyle choices that present themselves by owning a 4WD/SUV, such as getting out into nature. This leads me to my last point…
  6. Dishonest marketing. I reserve my most vehement vitriol for the manufacturers themselves, particularly their marketing departments. In the mid 1980’s sales of these vehicles accounted for about 2% of total sales. By the early 2000’s they accounted for over 20%, and growing. Why the increase? While the US car makers were getting thumped in the marketplace by the Japanese car makers with better, cheaper cars someone realised they still made good margin on 4WD/SUV’s. So they started putting a strong emphasis on selling these to stop themselves from going broke. Fair enough, but lifting their game in other areas would have also been a good idea. So in order to sell more 4WD/SUV’s they started to perpetrate the myth that owning such a vehicle would turn you into an outdoors type. Fast forward a few years, and they realised they had an easy market by selling to mothers by suggesting their family was safer in a much larger car. Meanwhile, these cars evolved from basic work utility vehicles to luxury suburban cars that were heavier and therefore more fuel-hungry. The really annoying part is that neither myth is even close to being correct. Less than 5% of 4WD/SUV’s ever get taken off-road (and most of these are taken off-road rarely). Being in a 4WD/SUV, and having more of them on the road is not safer.

I haven’t gone to all the trouble of finding and listing sources for the points I present above as facts, but I know I could if I had too. Just doing a Google Search brings up some really interesting points.

So, if you’re looking at buying a new car sometime soon, have a really good think about if you actually need a 4WD/SUV. If you do, fine - go and get one with my blessing. But if you are just buying one because of a false, marketing generated myth, please do yourself and everyone else a favour and buy something else.



5 comments to “Confessions of an 4WD / SUV user”

  1. Wel I had luck, site found… hip hip horray….. Yes, 4WD’s suck, big time, they suck your money, they suck the petroleum and they suck because they are too big for urban life. It is funny, I live in Japan, as if you didn’t know. and the latest craze over here recently is the hummer, that hugely oversized piece of American crap. Granted they may be good and have the options any wealthy person may want, but, our streets are no wider than a typical Australian footpath, and that is a two way street by the way, then you have these American want to be’s getting stuck up the only access street you have to get out to the main road, and you can spend up to 15 min-30 mins waiting for them to realize that their new toy is to big to got through..

    To make things worse, because they drive those oversized tanks, the only parking space they use is the Disabled persons parking zones.. but fear not citizens, in Japan, the disabled people are in the wrong for not understanding the plight of the 4WD drivers.

    Those Japanese, they just love baseball, and impracticality… It’s ironic I think, the worlds biggest builder of small cars prefer those Big monsters.

    A thought from the land of the rising sun.


  2. hehe, this post is considerably shorter than the discussion we had while camping.

    I think the treehugger link in point 2 above is interesting:

    They found that the extra weight provided enhanced safety (reducing injuries by a third) but the tendency to roll over completely offset this.

    I believe the “lousy drivers” you talk about increase the risk of rollover. If you don’t drive a vehicle within it’s limits, any vehicle is unsafe.


  3. […] I’ve written about this before, and gotten some comment on it. I wonder if this is likely change anyone’s view. Probably not. […]


  4. as a potential buyer of a jeep cherokee im in two camps of the argument. i agree as a professional driver of 25 years there are customers of the companies that are mislead in to purchasing a unit not of the proper standing for thier needs,

    but there are some of us, whom, altogether, not the sharpest tools in the shed are not altogether “idiots” either.

    I have researched the statistics and found that the jeep range and to a certain extent the small light offroaders are just as economical as the small commutercars.

    I have held off purchasing one for a few years and bided my time . and the cherokee is the winner

    its the size of a mid sized station wagon and with the economy of my nissan skyline (11lts per 100klms) . I also do intend to use it off road weekly as im required to go camping as a newly seconded supporter of my local scout troop and the skyline is just too fragile .

    however i intend to drive the skyline on the highway and keep the cherokee for the tough stuff.

    but i apologise in advance if i clog the carpark but even other users are just as bad as 4wd drivers it just the stereotype is more vivid in most motorists minds nowadays. i bet you have been a bully in your normal sedan as or if not worse than any 4wd driver.

    but im of a clear conscience about the other evils of owner ship as i found the so called japanese efficient 4wd were worse in every way.

    also the jeep is suited for alternative fuels either CNG or LPG and rest assured i will have it converted.

    and i agree with over use in the city and the burbs.as i said above i have retained the skyline for that work if not out in the scrub.


  5. Well Jim, we seem to agree on most points. If nothing else, you seem to have reasonable motives for wanting to buy a 4WD. For that I applaud you.

    I have to disagree about the point about 4WD drivers not being worse than drivers of regular cars. I just see so much evidence on a *daily basis* that supports the opposite argument.

    But even if we were to assume that all things being equal in regards to driving ability, I still think that isn’t good enough. They are by their nature big and potentially dangerous vehicles, and as such they probably shouldn’t be getting driven by ‘ordinary’ drivers.

    On a related note, it disappoints me greatly that Ford have released a 245 kW Territory. If there was a vehicle on the road that should require advanced driver training as a pre-requisite to purchasing, this would have to be it.




Leave a Comment


h1