Changes in Music Listening Habits
April 10th, 2006
I read an interesting post recently on Zan Rowe’s blog which, to a degree, mirrored some of my own thoughts in relation to how technology affects the way in which I, and the larger community, listen to and enjoy music. She talks about how it is so easy to get hold of so much new music, thanks to technology like the internet, MP3’s and MP3 players.
Although being able to access new music is a great thing, can it result in ‘overload’? Can this perhaps devalue the worth of the music? Are we likely to become less-discerning listeners, focusing more heavily on songs we like, as opposed to albums we like? (This last questions really plays on my mind - I’m a big fan of albums, and the journey they can provide for a listener).
Zan makes two points which really resonate with me. The first is the how music that is meaningful to us is often more than just a particular progression of notes and lyrics. As Zan says, “Music is about human experience.”
How so?
For instance, a particular song can evoke memories of moments of great personal, emotional importance to us. Even though they aren’t exactly my favourite band, I’ll always have fond memories pop into my head when I hear Coldplay’s song, Yellow.
It may be the manner in which we discovered a band or an album. I love the fact that I saw Blink-182 the first time they toured Australia, supporting their Cheshire Cat album. There was only about 50 people in the joint, and none of them were 14 year old girls in love with Travis (in fact, Travis wasn’t even in the band then!). Although they subsequently became a joke (and I don’t mean in a good, Ramones kind of a way), I remember that gig and regard that album very highly. My sister, Abbey, has opened my eyes to some great bands, such as the Shins and Snow Patrol, over the last couple of years. This personal recommendation from someone whose opinion of music I trust adds to the value of the music for me.
Some of the people commenting on Zan’s blog also make a strong argument for the benefit of album cover art, and I have to agree. I have purchased albums before on little more than the strength of the cover art, and some of those purchases are my favourite albums. Jebediah’s Braxton Hicks album falls into this category for me. To even draw a longer bow, I bought Guttermouth’s Covered With Ants album largely based on the fact that the guitarist played a Gibson Les Paul with a huge Victoria Bitter sticker over it in the film clip to She’s Got The Look, a song from that album. I just thought that was cool, you know?
The second point Zan makes is to do with how we are supposed to make time for all this new music in out lives. I’ve been guilty of buying new music, but not really giving it more than a cursory listen. This is usually a time issue with me, but I can only see it getting worse, not better. I left the following comment on Zan’s blog:
I’ve been thinking about this myself recently. I’ve recently completed the task of converting my entire CD collection into my iTunes Library. When that was finished, I found I wanted to add more, and more! Somewhere along the line, it became some weird kind of competition with myself. It took me a little while to realise this is strange behaviour, and to re-embrace my belief that quality of the music is important, not quantity.
This issue of quality being more important to me than quantity is a big one. Some of my favourite albums needed many listens before I really developed an appreciation for them (I’m thinking in particular about Billy Bragg’s Talking With The Taxman About Poetry album). I’m not sure that I would invest that same time into a new album these days, and it really concerns me that I’m going to miss some gems.
I think there is a larger issue here, which is what I think Zan was getting at, and that is technology isn’t necessarily improving our lifestyle. More doesn’t always equal better, because the one thing we can’t change is how much time we have. Even if you’re not a huge fan of music, or not as obsessive about it, you’ve got to agree that the issue of remaining time-poor is something that affects everyone.
Technology can’t help that, and probably just makes it worse most of the time.
I definitely agree that quantity of music will never compensate for quality. Technological advances like ipods or itunes promote the importance of quantity - why else would they keep inventing smaller ipods with larger memories to store more songs that you probably wouldn’t even get to listen to in the space of a year? Time wasters they are in my opinion and a really good marketing ploy that people just eat up, soon they will release and ipod the size of a chip that can store 50,000 songs on it, WHO CARES!!! you probably won’t even get to listen to a quarter of that in the space of two years! - hahaha it reminds me of an ad i was watching a while ago totally unrelated to music but to how much companies spin out to consumers and they gobble up unfortunately. Remember the Mac 2 shavers? hahaha then it was Mac 3 and then they brought out Mac 4!!! Yes it gave you a closer shave but they failed to tell you that multiple blades takes off excess skin which then grows back over the hair shaft and gives you hideous and painful in grown hairs on your face. I’m still waiting for Mac 5 “it gives you a closer shave that takes off half your face! Thanks Mac 5!!” Same deal with Ipods, they should sell them with a warning that they will without purpose take away time from you that you will never get back.
Half of my collection has a lot of nastalgic value - but then there’s the music that just plain blows your mind with cut throat tight baselines, good strong heavy riffs and drumming with more feel than you could poke a stick at. Those are the things that grab my attention with music. Not just for the nastalgic value or the mood they grab or set, but also for the pure artistic talent and natural feel that is required to make complex music sound simple and enjoyable and not just a show of speed and complexity. Over load of music just makes for more work of sifting through all the garbage they churn out now to get to the gems. In short, I hate Ipods………I could’ve just said that.
I certainly agree with your point Ro, it is largely rampant consumerism at work.
I have to say that I love my iPod though. It keeps me company on the rare occasion I find myself relaxing all on my own out-of-doors.
But yea, too much is just too much.